Well, all I can say is it's about time. According to an article in this week's Washington Post, child rearing experts have now declared that "empty praise" does little to raise a child's self-esteem and that local schools are responding by starting to demand academic rigor and effort from their students. Wow. How many years of research and how much grant money went into finding out that praising children for doing essentially nothing does essentially nothing to raise their self-esteem or their achievement. I could've told you that from the get-go and used the money to hire more teachers and buy more textbooks.
My own daughter has attended public school through the "everyone is special just because" years. Kids were bombarded with prizes, award ceremonies, "graduation" ceremonies from kindergarten onward, and trophies for every soccer team whether they won or lost. These kids are sticker addicted praise junkies who depend on a cheering section for every move they make. They have no sense of internal mastery or motivation. They often can't judge accurately whether their performance is adequate, inadequate, or really great because the adults around them praise them for correctness, improvement, effort, or even just showing up. While I certainly don't advocate going back to the dunce corner, it seems to me that the best way to help a child build his or her self-esteem is by helping that child master a skill or learn information.
There seems to be an implicit assumption underlying the self-esteem boosting theories that the reason some children "can't" learn is that they lack self-esteem. By boosting their confidence, they will gain the motivation necessary to put forth the effort to learn. This seems rather insulting to me. It puts the onus of the problem on the child or on the child's parent(s) or environment for causing his or her lack of self-confidence. Fix the child's social/emotional issues, and he will learn. While this may be true for some children, this theory does not look for causes of learning problems in teaching methodology or the school system. It has also proved ineffective. By and large, children in the United States overestimate their abilities compared to students in many other countries (source). By demanding more rigor and giving praise in response to specific achievements or goals attained, the child will most likely receive less praise, but the praise will likely be more meaningful. Encouraging sustained effort until success is achieved, rather than just the effort with or without a successful result, communicates to the child that he or she is capable of succeeding. As far as I'm concerned, nothing boosts self-confidence more than actually succeeding.
So, the next time you want to help your child or another child feel better about himself or herself, avoid doling out empty generalities like "you're so smart!" or "great try!" Instead, praise your child for being persistent when he or she is frustrated, for taking risks to learn new things, and for sticking with something in order to master it. Give your child specific feedback about what he or she did well and then help with those things that were not done well so that (s)he can improve. No one says that this need be done with an iron fist and a bull horn. Quite the opposite. What I'm advocating is that children be treated with respect and honesty rather than pandering and insincerity. Now there's a novel theory!

- Lolamouse
- Poetry and snark blogger who also has a creative side (who knew?)
Showing posts with label teach your children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label teach your children. Show all posts
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Back To School Lingerie
Don't know about where you all live, but around here it's almost time for the new school year to start! That means time to shop for supplies for school--paper, pens, pencils, lunchbox, lingerie, protractor, highlighters...What's that? Lingerie, you say? You didn't know that school kids need lingerie? No, not Spiderman or Little Mermaid underpants or even new bras for the high school girls; I'm talking lingerie.
Take a gander at this website for the French company Jours Apres Lunes. They are marketing a collection of lingerie for girls aged 3 months through teen. Yes, now your baby can look sexy in that Pampers! And, heck! Who needs breast tissue to rock out a bra?!! Check out some of the preschoolers and elementary school girls on this website (as I'm sure loads of pedophiles will be doing). What really bothers me about all of this (aside from creating a market for something totally unnecessary) is that even when the garments aren't totally inappropriate, like a simple tank top, the company has the young models posing in a provocative manner with make-up and adult hairstyles. It is clear that they are going for the Lolita look in many of the ad photos, and this is disturbing.
If one looks closely at the ads, as I tend to do, one also notices some other interesting, and bothersome, things. The print in the girl's book reads "Le talent n'attend pas le nombre des annees." Roughly translated, this means, "Her talent belied her years." I have to wonder what talent they were speaking of. In the next ad, the words around the photo say, "Chic," "French Touch," "Impertinence," "Second Skin," "Glamour," and "Graphique." Then there's a picture of a bird in a cage. Interesting juxtaposition of images, I'd say.
All in all, this ad campaign makes me want to vomit. It attempts to create a market for a totally unnecessary product and in doing so, sexualizes teens and young girls. Kids need lingerie like they need sex toys. What's next? Mini sized dildos for the young beginner in trendy teen colors? Cool vibrators that let you load iTunes into them so your daughter can hear Justin Bieber while she learns to masturbate? Wait! That's my idea!!!
Take a gander at this website for the French company Jours Apres Lunes. They are marketing a collection of lingerie for girls aged 3 months through teen. Yes, now your baby can look sexy in that Pampers! And, heck! Who needs breast tissue to rock out a bra?!! Check out some of the preschoolers and elementary school girls on this website (as I'm sure loads of pedophiles will be doing). What really bothers me about all of this (aside from creating a market for something totally unnecessary) is that even when the garments aren't totally inappropriate, like a simple tank top, the company has the young models posing in a provocative manner with make-up and adult hairstyles. It is clear that they are going for the Lolita look in many of the ad photos, and this is disturbing.
If one looks closely at the ads, as I tend to do, one also notices some other interesting, and bothersome, things. The print in the girl's book reads "Le talent n'attend pas le nombre des annees." Roughly translated, this means, "Her talent belied her years." I have to wonder what talent they were speaking of. In the next ad, the words around the photo say, "Chic," "French Touch," "Impertinence," "Second Skin," "Glamour," and "Graphique." Then there's a picture of a bird in a cage. Interesting juxtaposition of images, I'd say.
All in all, this ad campaign makes me want to vomit. It attempts to create a market for a totally unnecessary product and in doing so, sexualizes teens and young girls. Kids need lingerie like they need sex toys. What's next? Mini sized dildos for the young beginner in trendy teen colors? Cool vibrators that let you load iTunes into them so your daughter can hear Justin Bieber while she learns to masturbate? Wait! That's my idea!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)